Letter to City Council Re: Wildflower Property

2

Dear Council Members,

You will be making important decisions in the next few weeks relating to the Wildflower property. Three current Council members were not engaged in the initial process especially the meeting when the Council voted to purchase the property or the workshop held to entertain the peoples’ input along with proposals from several businesses seeking to participate in an RFP.

To assist the five of you in making the best decision for our city, will you please review the two meetings available on video.  Those of you that were there may find it refreshing to see what creative people came up with for using the property.

Decision to buy –  Meeting held 12-08-09.  Advance to 31 minutes, 00 seconds. Please note that the Mayor stated the use of the property being that of a park for all the people. Here’s link to site with meeting.

Workshop/RFP –  Meeting held 10-18-11.  View the whole meeting and get a complete view of how citizens hoped the property would be used. Here’s link to site with workshop.

The people you represent overwhelmingly want green space.  The idea was and is to “draw” the public to that waterside location and serve people of all economic levels.  The current proposal will only serve a few because of the cost of meals.  Their menu is on line.  What makes our City and community special are the beaches and parks which are mostly east of the Intra-coastal. This area, on the west side of the waterway, will allow many more people in the downtown area to make use of the site.  With Palmetto Promenade and other projects, apartment dwellers and home owners in the Golden Triangle will have a place to enjoy the water.  Only Red Reef Park offers a water view with picnic tables but it is not close to downtown. The Wildflower property would serve many more families were there picnic tables, some shade trees, a fountain for children to run through, a place to watch the Boat Parade, a site for functions hosted by the City, Chamber of Commerce, Rotary etc, it would be for all the people.

Please consider what is best for everyone in your decision.  If left as public green space its use can be changed in the future with ease.  If you embark on the limited use as a restaurant you will miss the opportunity to truly see what is best for the majority of those you serve.  The City does not need the money as it did back in 2008 or 2009.  I would bet the residents would be happy to contribute to their common green space knowing they, their children and grandchildren can take advantage of it. Financial contributions with donor recognition can be requested to support specially designed benches, tables, the fountain, walking paths with stones and other facilities. This property needs to be protected and preserved for all people of varying incomes.

Respectfully,

James and Nancy Hendry

Previous articleLet’s Talk Local Politics…Things Are Moving Fast!
Next articleUrbanization……and the Millennials
Nancy and James Hendrey arrived in Boca Raton 32 years ago as IBMers. From Hawaii to Dallas to Atlanta and Boca, for them, IBM meant "I've Been Moved". In 1988 they chose to leave IBM management and take an employee "buyout" and start their own business. Twenty-five years later they chose to retire and stay in place. "With our previous experience as teachers, sales professionals, product developers, advertising managers, small business owners and real estate developers, we both have unspent energy, especially when it comes to protecting the city we love."

2 COMMENTS

  1. Thank you Jim and Nancy. Your research allows our residents to remember the City Council’s legislative history for acquiring the Wildflower property in the first place. It also allows current council members to ‘remember’ as well…..
    Facts are tell-tale. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion but not to their own facts….Facts do not change.
    Political will may change especially if one accepts,as I do, that most of what was said for public consumption by past council members on this subject was pure subterfuge and extremely calculating.
    Subterfuge because the true motivation of those former council members was not disclosed;
    Calculating because the public has relatively short memories and history has a tendency to get clouded .
    Your research of the public record, spoken and recorded, is invaluable.
    BocaWatch is proud to be the platform where the facts shine and where the fiction come to an end.
    Al Zucaro

  2. I attended the meeting this morning concerning the Houstons/Wildflower project.

    Knowing that part of the revenue package to the city would be 5% of the restaurant’s gross annual business, I asked what the guesstimate of the yearly business would be. I did not know that the 5% doesn’t kick in until they hit the $10 million dollar mark. He only said that they hoped it would do well, I pressed him and asked what does the Boca and Pompano locations do? He did not answer. So I googled it-According to Manta, both restaurants do between 5 million and 10 million dollars. So it is possible that we could loose out on 1/2 of the revenue stream. Rent $500k and 5% of $10 million is another $500K!

    When Steve Alley was giving his wonderful followup presentation he said something that is hard to believe and backed up by the the article in the Sun Sentinel this morning. The conclusion of the traffic study that the city is going to spend $50k on isn’t due for three months. This is after the city council has it’s meetings in early to mid September and a possible final review on September 22. Can there be a final review prior to the outcome of the traffic study?

    Randy

    P.S. Steve Alley presented a wonderful history of the immediate area.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.